Workable Spiritual and Scientific Convergence of Technology

Faster than the speed of light – the comm line of God.

communication line:
1. the route along which a communication travels from one person to another;
2. the line on which particles flow;
3. any sequences through which a message of any character may go.

A word or a thought is a something that you communicate with. You get them from others and also you pass them in and out; sensations, emotions, vibrations.

Other perceptions like sight and sound also travel on their comm lines.

So if you were to look up at the stars and say, ‘hello’ it may take a while for your comm to go through.

But at the moment you thought of or recognized the receipt point the comm line was fully established.

And it was at start and finish before any thought, decision, perception or word started to go down that line.

Think about any place, being or thing and you have opened one comm line. The particle and how fast on the comm line up to your own considerations.

Again look at a star at night and ‘open a comm line’, Say ‘hello’, and have it say, ‘ok’ back to you. Do it a few times.

Something faster than the speed of light? The establishment of a comm line is that.

An instantaneous establishment of two points across space, no matter the size.

It is the vehicle on which Love can travel, and is made. It is perhaps our interviewing togetherness.

A comm line established, carries the flowing of a multitude of small and large ideas, concepts or things.

This opens the idea of destiny; the set prediction of where a particle, civilization or idea is going in its motion and where it can expect to arrive at.

Dictated by the communication line previously established at Start.

I sometimes wonder if I am Gods particle or His comm line which was established at First Cause?

Don’t think on it too hard.

Salamat

Peter

“I can tell you that in my experience, the wider the
range of possibilities as one moves toward more of
a multidimensional thought stream and activity
path, the narrower one’s choices become as they
pertain to rightful living. You could even say that
freewill diminishes as one becomes realized to all
possibilities.” Dr. Jamisson Neruda

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Often it is said you must empty your mind or reduce it of noise to make remote viewing work.

We do have a mind or even various minds and we also have the ability to know and control them.

The ability to control pictures and mental masses is an ability we all have but the current skill to do it is an individual thing. We are lucky today to have many techniques to allow us to play with, handle or remove these masses, pictures, past frames of reference or ‘noises’.

A Clear or OT I would perceive to be more reliable in their remote viewing sessions. Remote Viewing is not about looking into your own mind or the pictures it throws up. You also don’t want your analytical mind telling you what it is, like ‘of course its a..” coloring your sessions.

It is often stated there are natural psi proponents but I am more inclined to see them as ‘in charge of their own minds’, at piece with their pictures or perhaps Clear and OT.

Here is a brief lesson on remote viewing from who I consider the originator of the Science.

Here is the instruction book written by Ingo Swann – The Open Source CRV Pack

Note that he also has a Scientology background:

http://www.truthaboutscientology.com/stats/by-name/i/ingo-swann.html

Ingo Swann

NED FOR OTS

Source 20

1979-04-01

Puthoff, Price, Swann and several others in the SRI team shared the same explanation for “remote viewing”. They were convinced that remote viewers were leaving their bodies and travelling to the locations they were describing. They held in common a jargon phrase for this – “exteriorization with full perception”. The phrase was originated by a man whom most of the team referred to as the “Source”, the “Founder” or even the “Commodore”. But the Commodore was not a member of the U.S. Navy. He had given himself the title when he formed his own paramilitary “Sea Organization” in 1967. The Commodore was none other than the creator of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard.

Leading skeptic Martin Gardner attacked the experimental design given in Puthoff and Targ’s Mind Reach. In an article later published in Science Good, Bad and Bogus, Gardner commented that 14 Scientologists were involved in the project.

Most of the SRI team, including project director Puthoff, and the CIA’s star psychic spies, Price and Swann, were members of the Church of Scientology. Indeed, all three were graduates of Scientology’s own prolonged and expensive supposed psychic training. Pat Price died in an accident in 1975, but Puthoff and Swann were to control an enormous and highly secret U.S.

Jon Atack’s forthcoming book Scientology: The Hubbard Intelligence Agency

“Within the contexts of that research, neither meaning nor mental images come first.

Rather, signals come first, then meanings of them, and then mental images based on the meanings.

Within the scope of the human nervous systems, signals in-put via any of the sensory detectors are electronic in nature.

The electronic signals are then decoded, via pre-conscious processes, into meaning categories and specifics, and it is the results of this decoding that, in turn, trigger on mental perception of them.

Save to say that signals ARE somehow translated (transduced) into pre-conscious meaning, and then into mental awareness and perception, no one yet exactly knows how any of this takes place.

For clarity, three steps are involved here:

(1) Signal in-put;
(2) Meaning comparison within the contexts of meanings already stored in memory;
(3) Mental perceptions (feelings, images) built upon the meanings.

In any event, within the contexts of RV research at SRI, it turned out that meaning (of things and situations) was the fulcrum of functioning BETWEEN signal in-put and mental images of them.

This is to say that remote viewing does not begin with mental perceptions, whether in the form of feelings or images that are propelled into the state of conscious awareness of them.

Rather, these are the end products of the two preceding steps, both of which are contained in functions that are pre-conscious beneath conscious awareness of them.”

Ingo Swann.

Russell Targ was involved with “thosophy”.The theosophical Society New York

Please read his Remove Viewing Story here : Do you see what I see

Both Ingo Swann and Russell Targ do not focus so much on RV anymore in their lives and persuits. But they both constantly talk of the Spiritual Nature of Man and we should note this. RV is a game within a much larger sphere of ‘getting it’ spiritually.

The Human Species and the real possibilities with perceptions and connectedness. These guys are our closest mix of Science and Spirit and as they say “all is Spirit”. Note also the two Spiritual Groups they belonged too.  If you are interested – The New York Theosophical Society

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Basic and yet advanced Spiritual Enlightenment Program

A program is a set of actions that you can do to your mind etc by your spirit. God, Spirit, Mind, Body, Universe. A good program gets you closer and more able in all of them.

The Program I would recommend at this point for better awareness and abilities is:

Read Self Analysis and begin on the lists provided within. This will familiarize yourself with your mind, memories and emotions.

Study ‘Understaning the E-meter” to get a basic view on MEST ( Matter, Energy, Space, Time) and Theta (Spirit).

Added 23 Jan – If you can fly your own rudiments please do so. Follow this procedure over the current RTC Scientology rudiment practices. Or indeed understand the purpose of being sessionable and come close to your own method eg. just ‘lock scan’ from your last session to now until relief. do some objectives from Pilots materials, repair actions from TROM on timebreaking current mental masses etc.

Read and begin on the UCP – Universal Consciousness Practice. This is very easy to understand and you should be able to start ASAP. Set aside an hour per day.

Read and begin on the TROM – The Resolution of the Mind materials. This will take some serious study to finally understand the simplicity. Set aside another hour per day.

Read and begin on the Spiritologie materials and begin Imagination Processes. Just read the last three chapters to get the gist of it. Set aside another hour per day.

Alternatively you could also begin on the Pilot Self Clearing Materials. But the above is my suggested route. The above processes and technology are free and the only expense is your time. So make it go right and start now!

If you think it is possible that ‘your thinking can change your life!’

Start on these affirmations if you agree with them. Bless these as truth a few times a day.

These are the best materials I have found to be both simple and powerful in scope and results. Good Luck!

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

As I am a fan of TROM – the resolution of the Mind and its attributes of comparing then and now. Similarities and differences. I have recently run into UCP or Universal Conscious Practice.

Below is a summary and allows a person to start immediately.

Very nice tech and very easy and powerful.

By Konchok Penday

INTRODUCTION TO UCP:
HOW TO DO UCP!

The Universal Conscious Practice [UCP] is a profoundly simple and 
extremely powerful consciousness or awareness enhancement process, 
procedure or practice which improves emotional-mental-spiritual ability and 
can be done by almost anyone . . . with ONLY the information in this article.

It can be done with another person as your Witness, or all by 
yourself, which is easier with the free Virtual Witness program.

This article is written from the point of view of a Witness
coaching a Seeker, but UCP is also a self-guided practice.

See references at end of this article for download URLs.

UCP is so radically simple that people often dismiss it with no 
testing because they incorrectly imagine something must be 
complex to be powerful and effective. In fact, just the opposite 
is true. The more complex a methodology or procedure is, the 
more limited and narrow it becomes, the less utility it has, and 
the faster you must throw it away and find another practice 
that still has “bite” or effectiveness to make further progress.

UCP gives results from the beginning, and keeps on giving more 
and better results as long as you continue to practice it. Each 
new session builds on the awareness of all those preceding it.

SEEING things exactly AS THEY ARE, without any additions, 
filters, alterations or denials, is THE basic curative process.
UCP directly develops your ability to SEE * WHAT IS * NOW. 

Every discharge or trauma reduction process is merely a way 
of getting the Seeker to SEE THE PRESENT, AS IT IS. Seeing
things as they are allows you to actually change them. The more 
a process limits what the Seeker looks at, the more limited it is.

UCP is the basic meta-process or underlying supra-set of ALL 
workable therapy or self-improvement: the fundamental basis 
of rational thought itself. I am well aware this is a huge claim: 

==============
DO UCP & SEE!
==============

THE CIRCLE OF NOW

UCP is a procedure that starts in the present, circles repeatedly 
about it, and ends in a new present. It brings to consciousness 
what is actually [although unconsciously or unknowingly] already 
in the present, examines it thoroughly, and either dissolves it into 
nothingness, replaces it, or puts it back where it truly belongs.

UCP can be represented by a very simple circular diagram 
with PRESENT in the middle, FUTURE ahead, PAST behind, 
and COMPARE PRESENT TO actions on right and left sides:

                          1] FUTURE

4] COMPARE     0] PRESENT     2] COMPARE
    TO PAST                                 TO FUTURE

                          3] PAST 

The process starts in the middle with Step 0.
Then it goes 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3 . . . around the 
outer ring, til it ends in the middle at 0 again.

Here are the UCP questions, what they do, and how they work:

INSTANT UCP INSTRUCTIONS:

STEP# QUESTION 
================

0] WHERE ARE YOU NOW?
[Describe PRESENT scene to satisfaction.]

1] WHERE MIGHT YOU BE?
[Describe FUTURE scene to satisfaction.]

2] COMPARE THAT TO NOW.
[Describe Similarities and Differences to satisfaction]

3] WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
[Describe PAST scene to satisfaction.]

4] COMPARE THAT TO NOW.
[Describe Similarities and Differences to satisfaction]

IT'S AS EASY AS A, B, C:
A] START WITH STEP 0
B] REPEAT STEPS 1-4 TO “KNOW”
C] END WITH DISCUSSION AND AGREEMENT

DETAILED EXPLANATION OF PRACTICE STEPS

0] WHERE ARE YOU NOW?
[Describe PRESENT scene to satisfaction.]

I just ask “Where are you now?” If a new Seeker, I explain that this is
their opportunity to look at their entire life and scene and examine
anything important about it. We are not listing anything or looking for
whys or causes or solutions or anything like that. It's just a Look, See
and Say about where they are now. “Where” is interpreted in the most
general way. I often used to say “Tell me about your universe,” or 
“What's up with your life?”, but it seems more logical and consistent to
go with the past/present/future model, and it works just fine either way.

It's the same question as “What's happening with you?”, “Tell me 
all about it!”, “How is it going?”, “What is your attention on?”, “What
do you think about now?”, “What is your intention now?” “What's up?”.
“What is your viewpoint?”, or any of many other phrases which mean 
essentially the same thing. After the Seeker gets the hang of UCP, 
they don't care what you say because they know what they are doing. 
It's what the Seeker does that is important, not what the Witness says. 
You could simply say “Talk!” . . . and in fact I have done that too.

A new Seeker may well talk for two hours about his entire life. 
A Seeker who already had a session this morning will probably 
give me a minute or two about what he has noticed since his last 
session. I don't care. He talks until he has looked at “Where 
he is now” and described it to his own satisfaction, not mine.

This orients him to the present, creates a starting point for him 
to compare other scenes to, and makes his universe clearer.

1] WHERE MIGHT YOU BE?
[Describe FUTURE scene to satisfaction.]

This is the POTENTIAL, FUTURE, IMAGINE, MOCK-UP, CREATIVE 
side of the process. It is not a tightly worded or narrowly construed 
question. You could probably just as well ask “What might happen?,” 
“Imagine a possible future,” or anything similar. The words are not 
critical as long as you understand what you are doing. I merely want 
him to create or notice some possible or even impossible future. It 
does not have to make immediate sense or even be actually possible. 
I just want him to fish something out of his universe and look at it. 

Whatever the Seeker thinks of is fine with me. Anything he imagines
is a proper answer. It could be a state of mind, an emotional state, a 
mental attitude, a spot on the highway, a physical position, a logical
computation, a social position, a role he plays, etc.. It can be 10,000 
years in the future, impossible by definition, in his wildest dreams, in 
another dimension, in a parallel or non-parallel universe . . . whatever. 
An unwritten Star Trek adventure is fine! It can be the same fantasy 
he's looked at 20 times already. Great! I don't care. Anything will do! 
His attention is on it NOW . . . so it MUST be the right thing to look at!

I don't even care if it is really from the future or not. I often have the
Seeker tell me a place he “might be,” and in the process of describing 
or comparing it . . . he realizes it is actually an incident from his past.
Fine! He snuck up on a REGRESSION by putting it in the future to 
make it more confrontable! Of course, that is also a possible future 
place, as he might be there again some day. You might notice this 
selection method is very similar to traditional “free association,” except
that traditional therapists don't know what to DO with what comes up.

I once had a session in which “Where I Might Be” was the dream 
I had this morning . . . and analyzing the dream by comparing it to 
where I was now was profound, and took me all the way up to “know” 
in a huge area of my universe that was making me very frantic. 

Notice that this same dream might also have come up on the past 
leg of “Where I Was, this morning.” Often it seems random whether 
something comes up on the Future or Past command. Who Cares? 
As long as it comes up, it's there . . . so you can now LOOK at it!

This future leg of the process helps the Seeker discover his future, 
or lack thereof. It allows him to create new futures, and to change 
his mind and revise them. It lets him separate his goals, fantasies 
and possibilities from the actuality of his present time, and see how 
his future, or lack thereof, is actually created by him in the NOW.

This is simple and easy because you are not trying to figure out 
what the Seeker should put his attention on, and when he should 
take it off. You don't have to find, assess or analyze mysterious 
stuff in the dusty far corners of his mind to pick a minute obscure 
topic or “item.” You just gently help him look at whatever IS NOW.

Since that is all that is needed, anything additional would be an
unnecessary complexity and distract the Seeker from his important 
work. The less the coach / therapist / Witness does, and the less 
attention the client / Seeker has on him, the better UCP works. If the 
Seeker is so absorbed he forgets the Witness is there . . . Wonderful!

This description of “where he might be” could be 2 words . . . or 20
minutes. I don't really care, as long as the Seeker describes it to his
satisfaction. When he is ready to look at something else, we go on.

2] COMPARE THAT TO NOW.
[Describe Similarities and Differences to satisfaction]

This step has the Seeker compare the selected “something” with 
the present. I don't use the word “place,” because I don't want to 
define what he will be comparing. I don't know if it will be an attitude, 
a computation, a physical location, an activity, an emotion, a state 
of mind, a beingness, an identity, or whatever . . . and I don't care. 

Whatever he talked about on Step 1, I just want him to compare 
that to NOW . . . which may still be what he described Step 0 
. . . but quite likely has changed considerably since then.

By “COMPARE,” I am asking for SIMILARITIES and DIFFERENCES, 
but I only ask for them specifically if I am grooving in a new Seeker 
who is not used to UCP and is still feeling his way into it, or who may 
be reluctant or inhibited in talking. Otherwise “compare” is fine.

This step could be two sentences, or it could take two hours as he 
looks back and forth between the two scenes over and over again, 
seeing more and more clearly, and describing things in more and 
more detail and texture . . . until he loses interest in this.

In order to compare the two elements, the Seeker essentially 
has to view both pictures, incidents, viewpoints or whatever at 
the same time. This in itself is extraordinarily beneficial to him. 

Most people's awareness is much like a television set displaying 
a station selected by a remote control . . . in someone else's hands. 
They are totally hypnotized by whatever program, picture, valence, 
identity, advertisement, idea, etc. is currently displayed on screen. 
They compulsively identify with whatever that is as “themselves”. 

When the picture flips to a different channel, it's still “them,” as far 
as they are concerned . . . and they have *NO* awareness that it's 
actually a different channel and program. They can only duplicate 
or comprehend one viewpoint at a time, and it's totally beyond their 
awareness that they were just spouting a totally different party line.

The constant discipline of comparing builds the ability to view 
two viewpoints, pictures, etc., at the same time. This forces 
them OUT of the picture they have been IN, and gets them to 
adopt the viewpoint of the being who is looking AT the pictures. 
This DIFFERENTIATES them from the pictures they have been 
compulsively dramatizing, and are now self-determinedly viewing. 

If their attention is on only one item, they can interiorize into it 
and BE it. When they confront two pictures and compare, it is 
very clear that they are neither one, but the viewer of pictures. 

This is an enormously important spiritual capacity to develop. 
It builds enormous self-awareness of the Seeker as the creator 
of his own universe, and greatly enhances his ability to knowingly 
create himself and his future. This simple ability is far beyond the 
realm of most individuals who believe themselves to be spiritually
advanced, but are actually quite thoroughly lost in pretense and 
hysterical compulsive identities which they strenuously dramatize.

While doing UCP, you will normally see many different kinds of weird 
mental phenomena, known variously in different disciplines by many 
arbitrary terms, appear with a vengeance . . . and disappear again with 
no fancy complex rigid process commands, no chains of earlier similar 
incidents, no tricky diagnosis or evaluation of what is wrong, or what 
to do, no hypnotic suggestions, and no Seeker attention on the Witness 
or the Process. It's simple, smooth, often easy, and incredibly effective.

Just let them describe similarities and differences as long as they have
interest. It might be a few words. It might be many minutes of analysis
and cognitions. You don't have to worry about “flattening” it or getting
“all the charge off.” If the Seeker has more attention on it, his attention
will go back to it, and he can simply look at it again on the next merry
[or not so] go-round. You do NOT have to “control his attention” and 
tell him when to think about what, and when to stop thinking about it. 
You controlling his attention is always DESTRUCTIVE to HIS universe.
You just easily and naturally follow his lead to what HIS attention is on.

When he is satisfied he has seen what he wants to . . . we move on.

3] WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
[Describe PAST scene to satisfaction.]

This step of the process simply has the Seeker select something 
already existing that his attention is on. It is not critically worded. 
You could probably run it as “Remember something” or “What has
happened?”. This just asks for anything from his past. He simply 
selects something for examination from what has already happened, 
and is therefore PAST, and he is relatively the EFFECT of. It could be 
how his morning has been going so far, his reaction to a commercial, 
an exact specific incident lasting 1/10 of a second, a lingering thought 
he had 85,000 years ago as he lay dying, a room he used to live in, or 
a broad general scene that went on for trillions of years. I don't care.

This leg of the process is the EMOTIONAL DISCHARGE or TRAUMA
REDUCTION aspect of prior events. It includes as subsets all of 
the narrowly defined regression processes that many “well-trained” 
therapists know hundreds of. It handles and heals what has already
happened to the Seeker as effect. It leads naturally to the FUTURE.

4] COMPARE THAT TO NOW.
[Describe Similarities and Differences to satisfaction]

This is the exact same compare question as in the first leg of 
the process, and operates similarly, but compares the present 
with the past, fixed, effect aspect of the Seeker's universe, rather 
than the future, imagine, cause, create, potential aspect of it. 

The constant motion back and forth between the legs of 
the process keeps him from getting stuck in the past and 
dramatizing himself as hallucinatory total victim, and from 
getting stuck in fantasies of the future and dramatizing 
himself as hallucinatory total victor, or vice versi.

If the Seeker is heavily in DENIAL or DISASSOCIATION, it will
start to build CONNECTIONS between past, present, and future.
If the Seeker is in IDENTIFICATION, comparing past and future to
present separates them. It creates awareness of similarities and 
differences . . . a basic definition of sanity. It pulls the past out 
of the present, and lets it go to where it should be . . . back into the 
past. It separates the Seeker more and more from the past into a 
clearer and more sharply defined and understood present time. 

The constant comparing to “where he is now” keeps bringing him 
into the present. The entire process works as a “Havingness” 
process, giving him an entire universe to have. The net effect of
UCP is to help him SEE THE PRESENT, MORE CLEARLY, AS IT *IS*. 
This allows him to actually change his present, with a new thought.

BUMPS IN THE ROAD

The ONLY thing I have ever seen go “wrong” using UCP is that it stirs 
up “stuff” from the past and the Seeker starts to *UNKNOWINGLY* 
DRAMATIZE that stuff. Of course, it is SUPPOSED to do that, but some
times it turns on too hard. This can manifest in many different ways: 
protest, objections, complaints, criticism of the Witness, computations 
of “this is stupid”, “isn't working”, “won't work”, “can't work,” ANY kind
of misemotion, and so forth. This can interfere with DOING the process 
and STOP the session if the Witness does not SEE what is happening 
and correct it by simply having the Seeker LOOK at what is going on.

The major handle is simply to SEE that “where the Seeker IS NOW” 
is NO LONGER where he WAS when he started the session. The 
process itself has moved something else in, or moved him to a 
different place [take your pick of wordings for the same event]. 
You simply need to IDENTIFY where that new [old] place, feeling, 
computation, effort, intention, identity or so forth . . . IS *NOW*.

ANY kind of question focussed on WHERE THE SEEKER IS NOW will 
point to and bring that out. If the Seeker's attention goes OFF of his 
universe and ON to you, session complaints, or something else, you 
simply need to get him to LOOK at what is happening NOW. ASK HIM:
“WHAT IS HAPPENING?”
“HOW ARE YOU FEELING?”
“WHAT'S GOING ON?”
“TELL ME MORE ABOUT THAT!”
. . . or ANY other similar question that points his attention to 
HIS PRESENT [the center of the circle in our diagram] and 
gets him to LOOK AT, SEE, and DESCRIBE where *HE* is NOW.
THIS RE-ORIENTS HIM TO HIS *ACTUAL* PRESENT ACTIVITY.

Usually if there is some kind of “problem” the Seeker will be talking
about SOMETHING ELSE but him which is causing effects. You 
need to get his attention OFF of what something ELSE is doing or
might be doing or not and ON to what HE is DOING, RIGHT NOW!

Instead of him telling you about SOMETHING ELSE, he needs to 
tell you about HIM, NOW! For example, someone who is raging
at you that ……. [insert favorite person, condition, ghost, demon,
polical party, job, etc] …… is causing …….. [insert what he doesn't 
like or is sure to happen in the future, etc] …….. you need to get him
to look at WHAT *IS* RIGHT NOW untiI HE SEES . . . *HE* IS RAGING!

THEN YOU HAVE A NEW STARTING POINT, IN A NEW NOW.

Once you have identified WHAT is happening NOW in the session, you 
can use your understanding that this IS coming from somewhere else 
in his past universe, has been stirred up or manifested by the process 
as part of its normal operation, and simply needs to be addressed. 

Use your SECRET WEAPON and ask him the MAGIC QUESTION:

“EVER FELT LIKE THAT BEFORE?”
or any variation of that simple question.

Usually the answer is “YES!” and he tells you all about the 
PAST time or place, and you simply proceed as usual with 
“COMPARE THAT TO NOW.”

So the ENTIRE “correction” action when 
something goes “wrong” [i.e. "TOO right"] is:
1] Witness recognizes Seeker is SOMEWHERE “ELSE” NOW.
2] Witness gets Seeker to tell him WHAT is happening NOW.
3] Witness gets Seeker to SPOT WHERE it comes from in the PAST.
4] Witness has Seeker proceed normally by COMPARING to present.

*ONLY* TWO QUESTIONS ARE REQUIRED 
FOR THIS “REPAIR”: “NOW?” and “PAST?”

In theory, the Seeker might be unable to function because
of something from the FUTURE that was about to happen.
In practice, I haven't ever seen it, and I suspect that some
one who is bleeding to death or about to be arrested does
not usually wind up doing UCP unless it's to look AT THAT.

“NOW?”, phrased as in any of the examples above, simply 
has the Seeker LOOK AT what he is doing NOW in session, 
instead of BLINDLY DOING it. It is simply a *NEW* STEP 0!

“PAST?”, phrased as “Ever felt like that before?”, or any other 
variation appropriate to the Seeker's answer to the “NOW?”
question, is simply a variation of “Where have you been,” phrased 
to pick up whatever has just been stirred up by the process.

So the ENTIRE bag of “tricks” necessary to “fix” a difficult session 
can be summed up . . . not in 20 different repair lists with hundreds 
of different questions to figure-figure about. . . but in TWO WORDS:
NOW?
PAST?

If you can just remember this VERY SIMPLE concept, then if you 
start to have difficulty in a session, you can VERY SIMPLY correct 
fit. It is NOT complex. It MAY, however, be . . . extremely difficult!

IF YOU KEEP IT SIMPLE, AND KEEP *DOING* IT, 
UCP WORKS AMAZINGLY WELL AND RAPIDLY.

Above are the procedure commands. 
Below is the overall session pattern:

A] START THE SESSION WITH STEP 0

This identifies the present situation or scene, serves as a 
locational or orientation, and starts the process working.

B] REPEAT STEPS 1-4 TO “KNOW”

You are not looking for a sudden “cognition.” You want to cycle 
through Steps 1-4 over and over again until the Seeker comes up 
to “know” in the area of the session. He will not even know what 
area or topic the session is about until the end. On the way there, 
he will definitely be at “not know” or lower about the entire session, 
both what it is about and how it will resolve. If the Seeker THINKS
he knows what the session is about at the beginning, that is simply 
hallucination. Don't fight with it. Just let it happen. The Seeker 
simply has to work through his hallucinations. You do *not* assess 
for or pick a topic and then “run” a session “on” that topic or “item”. 
That will NOT work well. There will be some theme, topic or area the 
entire session is about, but you will not likely know what it is until it 
emerges at the end of session, when the Seeker comes “full circle” to 
his first concerns and gets up to “know” in that area of his universe.
If you have “problems” . . . handle with “NOW?” and then “PAST?”!

As the Seeker achieves more familiarity with UCP, he will naturally
STOP “doing it by the numbers” and gradually ease into simply
looking at what is there. He will then only need a question when
he “runs down” and isn't SURE what he should be looking at NOW.
The “by the numbers” approach is essentially a TRAINING AID.

C] END WITH DISCUSSION AND AGREEMENT

Some KEY wrap-up questions for doing UCP:
Have you noticed that during the session you are
now talking about what you started the session with?
Is more or less everything you talked about also related?
Does your first look at the subject now look more
like a misunderstanding of what the real issue IS?
Do you have a new understanding of how you relate
to that now . . . and what your expanded options are?

When the Seeker gets up to KNOW, it will be apparent to both of you. 

He will know what the session was all about. It will be clear to both 
of you that the entire session was about this one issue, even if it 
seemed like a random rancid stew of unrelated free[dis]association 
nonsense along the way. At the end, he will usually give you an
indication that he feels he is done with the session, and why.

This is the appropriate time for discussion about how the session 
went, what his emotional tone is, how the practice is going for him, 
questions and answers, observations about his life or life in general, 
or whatever comes up. Often, the Seeker will ask the Witness what 
he thinks about something. The natural thing to do is . . . Answer! 

This is the havingness or integraion phase. Having focussed his 
attention intensively on his own universe for the core of the session, 
the Seeker will typically broaden his attention to the exterior universes 
and seek other viewpoints to view and compare with his own now new. 
As he comes up to the ability of Communication . . . he communicates!

This phase might be just two sentences, or 
twenty minutes of new stuff popping in to see.

When you both agree you are done . . . you are done.

UCP is NOT a one-session do-once procedure. You practice it over 
and over again on an ongoing basis, integrating it more and more into 
your continuous consciousness. No one I know has ever used it up
yet. As long as you DO UCP, you will continue to raise your emotional 
tone level and your awareness. As the Seeker becomes more familiar 
with the practice and what he does in his own universe to make it happen, 
he will become less and less dependant on commands from the Witness, 
and will start to run “freestyle”. This is an excellent sign and should
be encouraged by the Witness . . . shutting up and doing nothing.

THE UCP UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUS PLOT:

A *HUGE* HELP IN DOING UCP IS THE CHART OF N-LIGHTENMENT!
which is an html document you can use on the screen or print on two 
sides for a one-page always-on reference what fits in your wallet.

It is a UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUS PLOT, aligning a growing number of 
individual scales, which allows you to locate your general or chronic
level of awarness, [where your attention chronically is], so you can
*WATCH* YOUR OWN AWARENESS *RISE* AS YOU *DO* UCP. 

This is a very powerful factor, for it puts 
you in charge of your own awareness. 

IN THE POSITION OF A GOD IN YOUR OWN UNVIERSE, 
CREATING YOURSELF IN YOUR OWN I-MAGI-NATION.

UCP SUMMARY

UCP addresses ANY aspect of 
PAST, PRESENT and FUTURE!

It performs the AS IT IS or DISCHARGE function of therapy,
as well as the CREATIVE, MOCK-UP role of self-discovery. 

It addresses WHATEVER the Seeker has stuck attention 
on, and handles it until the Seeker has NO attention on it.

It provides a UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUS PLOT
which helps you understand where you have been
*SEE* WHERE YOU ARE *NOW* MUCH CLEARER
and prepare yourself for where you are going next!

So you can understand it *WHILE* you experience it!

WELL . . . I THINK THAT JUST ABOUT COVERS IT!

You NOW have a powerful tool to help yourself and
your family, friends, and anyone else you wish well.

All basic UCP data is completely free at the web site.

There is a lot more to learn to become expert on UCP,
but that has been done in as little as a few weeks, in
much less than 24 hours of actually doing UCP . . . AND

UNDERSTANDING THIS ARTICLE ITSELF QUALIFIES YOU 
TO GIVE YOURSELF A UCP SESSION! . . . RIGHT NOW!

The FREE Virtual Witness program makes that much easier!

Forget about your figure-figure . . . 
just *DO* some work on yoursELF!

PLEASE *DO* UCP!

Best Wishes,

WE'LCOME TO
*ACTUALLITY!*

THANK YOU FORECHOOSING YOUR 
ROLE IN THE COSMIC DRAMA NOW!

RESET YOUR SELF!
REBOOT YOUR MIND!
RECOMPILE YOUR BIOS
REINSTALL RATIONALITY
DEBUG AND UPGRADE
YOUR OWN OPE'RA'TING
SYSTEM . . . RIGHT! NOW!
N-LIGHTENMENT *NOW!*

YOU'RE JUST TH'OU'GHT AWAY
FROM COMING UP Y'OUR WAY.

FIND OUT HOW 
TO *FIND OUT!*

WHAT YOU DO
IS UP TO YOU!

THE WAY 
TO *SEE*
*IS* UCP!

*DO* UCP 
AND SEE

Konchok Penday
  <KP@net-prophet.net>
  Research & Technical W'RIghT'ER
Integrator: Universal Consciousness Plot
  http://net-prophet.net/ucp/chart.htm
Formulator and Disseminator of the 
  Universal Conscious Practice:
  http://net-prophet.net/ucp/

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

In Scientology we have the basic definition of Clear as ‘a being without his own reactive mind’.

In Spiritologie we have the basic definition of Clear as “A spiritual being without its own subconscious”.

Warning: This blog is written to those specifically with a Scientology training background. I skip many gradients because I assume you have already received some training. Regardless read the book and always study the source materials.

Of course there is a Clear Cog and meter phenomena and supposed abilities attained.

But lets take another view of a 1st Dynamic Goal and that of Spiritologie.

( he is stated to be the LRH of 1965 or one of Rons higher BTs, but I am sure that is another story )

This out of the Spiritologie handbook and I highly recommend it as a book to read. It will save you months of study of Scientology as it covers all of the basics very nicely.

I suggest you read the book fully as the below is just some cut and paste!

——————————-

“A spiritual being without its own subconscious”, is described in Spiritologie as the first big awareness-level to be rehabilitated.”

1. A SB (Spiritual Being) who – knowingly and willingly – is cause over mental space, mental time, energy and matter.

2. A SB which is aware of possessing and steering a physical body; but is also aware of the fact not to be it.

3. A SB without repressions, fears, compulsions or so called psychosomatic illnesses caused by one’s own thinking.

4. A SB with the ability to create, let continue to be or delete every type of subconscious for itself.

5. A SB which released itself from the dedicated (fixed) link to the pictures, masses, energies, pictures, times and spaces of the mind and can think and decide completely independent from it.

6. A SB without undesirable or enforced behaviour patterns – seen from his own viewpoint.

7. A SB whose conclusions, calculations, decisions or thoughts are no longer falsified or distorted by unconscious influences, that previously were the cause for faulty outcomes in his thinking or led to irrational behaviour.

8. A SB who took over the full responsibility for his thinking and acting and no longer attributes this to the past, the subconscious or other sources.

9. An SB without its own subconscious.

“When it is about the self-determination as Impulse 1 all points of this checklist are verified without exception in respect to the person himself!”

“I can assure you that this is an incredibly beautiful and powerful state, but I can also assure you that it only starts to really get moving after this step. Because when this state is reached or rehabilitated with full certainty, one can start to extend this to all eight life-impulses – towards full consciousness as infinity!”

This is a  Spiritologie Checklist to verify there first Level which should in my view summate to a correctly produced Clear.

——————————-

The book which is a massive read and covers all the points and basics of Spiritologie. Could not have been written better by LRH himself. Great small stories to give examples of all the pertinent points and a very simple and entertaining read!

LRH Scientology tech or truths is amongst this data in this book but mentioned in a modern light

eg. Third Party tech.”Is there no saying: ‘If two argue, the third one is happy’?”

Within this story he alludes that we are all ‘PTS to Gods mother in law’ a conclusion formed out of pope speeches. She has her her unwashed fingers in the bowl of mankind

‘Before the beginning was a cause and this cause made the decision to be. Previously, there were neither “being” nor “not-being”, only a potential to be.’

“If you sleep – dreamless sleep – are you then conscious that you exist? Do you have then the idea that you aren’t? No, and there is also no time or the question of “how long was the time before the beginning?” For as long as you sleep dreamlessly there is no “how long”, since time doesn’t exist! Therefore, there is not any idea either like: “How boring to be so long in the original state of non-being.” There simply is nothing at all, do you understand this? Okay, so this cause has by its own decision awakened to being and what did it see? Nothing!”

“Everything – and I actually mean exactly that, namely everything – which you perceive and experience, is exactly that, which you create by yourself through your own causal thinking; in fact exactly now!”

“We ourselves are the Supreme Being and can create divinely, as well as diabolically – but it will always remain our own creation! Happy, conscious work, God!”

“Self-determination is the ability to place matter and energy in space and time, as well as the even higher ability to create the space and the time, in which to place matter and energy.”

“From now on the world will change! And it will change because nobody will wait anymore for a God to free us from war and sorrow, or punishes us for our mistakes, as there is no God besides ourselves who could bring these things about – and did until now! Now, we are many. All with the same infinite, original potential to create – but this time to create consciously.”

——————————-

I am only up to page 128, 1/2 way but it is good and sometimes humorous reading for a past Scientologist’.

You will find the ‘free book download’ in my blog roll to the left of the screen

ps I read on past page 128 and it gets interesting…

Another quote..

“Spiritologie is not Scientology – Spiritologie is free!” – LRH

——————————-

You may wonder why a FSO Class VI C/S would entertain these ideas of new technology from a supposed LRH born in 1966.

Will firstly nothing is impossible but only actually limited by your consideration.

Secondly I consider the value and usefulness of the information as senior.

For example:

If ‘Dad’ came to you and offered in his hand a thousand dollars to help you out.

( But if your relationship with your mother is not one of understanding or giving )

He winks and says, “I am your Mum and we want you to have the money”. Would you then call him a lier and that he is not actually your Mum? Would you then refuse the money because of that?

I look, think then decide. Don’t forget or skimp on the looking ok, it may be fun! Enjoy!

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

For the people protesting Scientology I really hope you begin to lean all about it. What they hear about the Church is its crimes and hostilities and how the Church works to keep these a secret. That’s true. But perhaps a persons mind should not be colored against all possibility that the ‘Auditing Technology’ may actually work or have some value.

Why would so many people put up with so much shit if it did not work to any degree?

When you look at ‘Scientology Technology’ or the ’secret high level processes’, they are just simple sentences; words on a page! No-one could be impressed, not you, not me and so we get chants of ‘down with Scientology and Xemu!’

All of the Scientology Rundowns or processes are simple. They are made up of basic English words that we probably hear, read and see nearly everyday. Some processes that costs the public many thousands of dollars are only a few sentences long. That’s like a couple of thousand dollars per word ???

“Be something your not” is not a process but it shows an un-usualness with words and perhaps how you can mess someone up as be something you’re not is something you cannot do.

These a simple English sentences that are not impressive, magical or powerful.

So whats all the big deal then?

‘The Processes’ are only commands or questions, some may look strange because of grammar changes and noun forming etc But they are mostly simple, but no so simple as to be called stupid. How can these words work together to make powerful Clears or OTs?

These simple sentences work because of the ARC environment that you can create when two people agree to have a session. You both agree that your purpose is to use the techniques that an Auditor knows and to apply them. The result is a great auditing session.

It’s called a technology because it is tricky, requires practice, patients and skill. An ability to use the meter and the different methods of auditor action to make the PC feel safe and listened to. He will then be able to talk and let you know the answers to his problems, valences, to erase past charge on the track etc. The Auditor needs to know the effects that can happen in a pc so to handle it and get the pc through that session so to come out at the end happier.

If you dont understand the auditing environment, if you have not studied the basic books and then not ’spent hours of drilling and practice for months, well then you really cannot know about Scientology and Sessions. Not really..

When at Flag I was asked to take on an unhappy PC or one that wanted to stop sessions or blow from the Org. Sure I would get the charge off but then I would know he was audited beyond his reality. Or the Auditor was shit and the pc knew it.

I would indoctrinate the pc, all that means is ‘checkout what he knows about Scientology basics’ and what he knows about what we are currently doing in session. After an education and agreement we can ‘rock and roll’ and now fast with gains.

So the tech works for some people and many say it works for all people if they want to study it and persist.

The big deal is the Church and how they treat their own staffs and clients.

For sure protest and attack the Church as they are clearly the opponent and the doer of bad deeds. But take a look at the tech, so at least you can know somewhat of your enemy. You don’t have to be a PC but understand that the tech is why the Orgs are there, The Church on the other hand is there only for the money.

The Churches have been around for too long, too much fair game and forced disconnection.

As well now there is other tech in the field and I perceive it to be far more advanced and simple over the RTC Tech.

ANon should know a little bit about the initial Scientology Goals and it would make their protests and interviews so much better. ANon is doing a magic job that I think no-other group could ever of done!

VVWD

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

A very interesting briefing about all the Scientology Bridges.

What do I mean about all the Bridges?

Well through time the Bridge has changed a lot and The latest RTC Bridge is very different than all the prior Bridges.

See this video of all the Bridges side by side, get your questions about Clear resolved according to the Bridge.

This also gives great reference to the Scientology Clearing Course and shows how so much case gain has been taken off the current Bridge.

He also gives a LRH definition about Dianetics. “Dianetic Clear – there is such a state but only about 2% can go Clear on Dianetics”

So why are there so many Clear attests from NED? What happened to Power and R6-EW, CC etc

They still need expanded Scietology Grades to go Scientology Clear.

Funny story he mentions, an OT 8 comes to him and says, “I dont feel too OT!”

Rey says, “Well thats becasue you have not done the OT Levels! How are you going to feel OT if you have not done the OT Levels?”

He then explains why, showing how the true OT Levels have been removed off the modern Bridge.

Bridges shown 1970, 75, 78 & 82

Must watch video from Rey Robles.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

This is by Caspar de Rijk, HGA, Class IX

http://www.spiritologie.eu/briefing1_new_tech.htm is the full writeup!

I wrote up a series of evaluations called the Original Bridge Series and decided to play it safe and restored the Old Bridge incl. Grade V, VA (Power) and R6 EW and the Clearing Course as I knew for sure out of my own personal experience that road led to real clears. So we restored Standard Dianetics in the beginning of 2006 and had a ball with it. Also training auditors using Dianetics as the first step just like it was in 1969 was a great success.

LRH Mysteries

In the end of last year an old SO Member told me the story of how a lady of the LRH Household unit had told him in 1968 how LRH had several wardrobes for different body sizes, once I was told she saw LRH in his research room from the back and when she went down to tweendecks a few seconds later she saw LRH giving a lecture.

Well this was certainly an interesting story and would tend to confirm what LRH had already mentioned in the fifties that a thetan could run several bodies at once.

.. he had known in 1964-1966 period three different  L. Ron Hubbards, one was described as a red haired American, then there was a British Hubbard with some missing teeth and yet another one a size bigger with all kind of details like where they were banking and the brands of cigarettes they smoked etc.  He said that the American Hubbard had disappeared on 31 December 1965 never to be seen or heard of. And Filbert said the other two were impostors.

So I called the writer and found out it was this guy himself who was the one claiming to have been LRH. So I decided to find out what kind of a character this ‘joker’ was. This led to records as a movie actor and the lead singer of a heavy metal band named Stimmkraft. In other words unlikely.

However Jolanda and myself went over to Oberhausen, on a weekend to check him out. We met this character, a young person looking like a rocker and sat down to ask him some pertinent questions. Odd thing: he was born in 1966 in other words just after Filbert had asserted the original American Hubbard had disappeared.

We spent a whole evening with him and he did act the part even though this was sort of ‘strange’, less strange it was when he told his story and in particular I got very interested when he went on about his new tech developments.

The most outrageous claim

Here I found this man claiming to have been L.R. Hubbard, asserting in a calm sonore voice that he had as-ised scientology and that it was no longer needed. His (Hubbard’s) case that had been dramatized was now handled, this incl. OT III which had been discharged in 2004 after he fully handled Xenu.

That new tech development was called spiritologie and at first glance already it did make some sense even though it was almost childishly simple – or too simple for words. We had been invited to come by on Sunday again but Jo and me decided to skip it and drove home the next day and we decided to put this whole thing to some rigourous testing.

Download the book HERE

This is by Caspar de Rijk, HGA, Class IX

Potential

The potential of this new tech due to its “power of simplicity” is phenomenal and could easily fulfill the promises once made for something called Super Power; or what about making this tired planet smile.

“I have read about two ‘LRH is back’ websites the first was LRH2 which turned out to be Ralph Hilton playing a joke but still had very nice new tech write ups.

The second is Andreas Buttler out of Germany, also a well writen book once you are past the introduction, so take a read and let me know what you think!”

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Writen here is a great write-up of session style and purpose, showing the effective way of handling Rudiments in a session. You will be supprised at what you dont know about the basics when you read DartSmohen informations.

Visit the ESMB for great tech advices.

Here we go.

In the rote processing procedures of the cult (and possibly in the FZ, but I would imagine it is more relaxed there) the purpose of ruds is to KEY OUT whatever is sitting in the way of the auditor carrying out the procedure determined by the C/S.

This does not handle anything, merely to push it away (until the next time it KEYS IN again).

When I start a session I say START OF SESSION.

Then I ask HAS THE SESSION STARTED FOR YOU ?

Next, I ask WHAT GOALS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SET FOR THIS SESSION ?

Get them noted down.

Next question is WHAT GOALS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SET FOR LIFE ?

Now we are ready to proceed, unless there is an out-rud sitting there. We handle this and then get that question answered.

The handling of the ruds is just like any other processing action; process the person in front of you and handle what comes up.

ARC BREAK

Typically, when a Scn auditor asks “Do you have an ARC Break,” (consulting the meter) if it reads, they say what is it.

Actually, you don’t need a meter. You have the pc in front of you. If his face is up his arse, you know there is something sitting there. Also, I have seen “FN’s” on a pc who is so charged up, they are looking for a sharp object to stab someone. Trust me, your pc is by far the best meter there is.

The pc says I had a fight with my mother (or some such thing).
An experienced auditor might well want more info; When was that, what happened?

Th pc describes what happened.
The auditor then asks “Was that a break in Affinity, A break in reality etc.

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.

The auditor is assessing an incident, NOT the ARC BREAK.

Per the cult definition, an ARC Break is a SUDDEN break in ARC. It does not happen gradually, it is SUDDEN. Something happened to cause the ARC to break.

So, find out more. At what point did the ARC break? It was there, then it wasn’t.

The “upset with my mother” is not the ARC Break. Something happened during that incident (upset). What suddenly happened is the ARC Break.

Usually spotting it results in a realisation. “Oh, it was when I saw her pick up a bowl to throw at me”.

NOW you can ask “At that moment in time, was there a ……”.
You are REPAIRING the break.

By dealing with the charge, force and mass, it erases. Now you can continue, unless, of course an earlier ARC Break comes to the surface. Deal with it the same way. You continue until whatever has been sitting ther has been erased and the pc is now fully in PT and is “in session”.

PRESENT TIME PROBLEM

If you process a person over the top of a present time problem you will not make progress. Why? Because the guy is not in session. His attention is fixated elsewhere.

What does “in session” mean? It means being there willingly and has attention on their case.

So, what is a problem? According to Hubbard it is a force-counterforce etc.
It floats there in PT.

So how does a problem come into being.?

Well, you have to consider there is a problem in order for it to exist.

If you don’t consider an opposing effort, force or intention to be a problem then is simply isn’t.

What happens is that at one moment you were certain, now you are uncertain. You have become confused about it.

That is why behind every PTP there is a prior confusion.

So, how did the guy get confused? In order to do so, they have shifted from cause to effect.

What caused them to switch? They became the effect of someone. As a result they became confused.

So, find out who that person was, the one who got them to become confused and thereby set up the PTP.

Now, WHY did they become the effect of that person?

Probably they had DONE or SAID something against them. Find out what it was, find out what problem they were trying to solve by doing it.

You will find that it all starts to fall away.

Again, this may well allow an earlier PTP to come to the surface.

What you are doing is handling charge, force & mass.

MISSED WITHOLDS

First of all, there is nothing wrong with a withold. You can have laudable ones; a partner’s present. organising a surprise party etc.

The problem comes when someone ELSE does or says something that makes YOU think they might know.

The effect is to cause you to separate away from that person. You might find you become critical of them, natter about them and try and avoid being in the same space.

What has happened is that charge has been triggered by what you perceive to be a “nearly finding out”.

The way to handle this is to determine what it was that you were witholding (this is not the charged aspect) and then find out whqt that other person did or said that made you think they knew.

Get exact place, time, allo details about that moment in time. This is confronting the charge and it will erase.

Again, it may allow an earlier MWH to surface. Repeat the same steps until the whole thing is handled.

As in all processing actions, HANDLED is the key word. It means “terminatedly taken care of, dealt with fully” It does not meqn KEY it out.

In order to end a session after completing the processing, or taking the client to such a huge win, they are totally blown out, you ask

How have you progressed towards your goals in life?

Have you acheived your goal fore the session?

If anything comes up, deal with it.

Is it ok if we end session?

If yes, then say END OF SESSION

Lastly you say TELL ME I AM NO LONGER PROCESSING YOU.

I trust this gives the answers you were seeking.

DS

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Scientology Technology can be briefly covered in three areas.

Ethics, Tech and Policy.

Currently Scientology has abandoned these three and just focused on PR and propaganda for money.

Ethics tech is the technology of survival it is the prerequisite for the Scientology Processes to work. If you are feeling guilty for your transgressions and actively causing harm in your life, well then it is very hard to be interested in your own case and willing to talk to the Auditor.

Ethics tech in itself is very valuable and also very dangerous when misused on others.

PTS tech, The Conditions, 3rd Party Law are all very valid and when working you will not only survive well but you will also feel great!

All the Church applies today is Disconnection and is quite type three and thinks enemies are everywhere. Funny enough this is starting to become true as they “make” more enemies each day.

LRH quotes:

“No matter how criminal an individual is, he will be trying, one way or another, to put ethics in on himself.”

“Ethics is so native to the individual that when it goes off the rails he will always seek to overcome his own lack of ethics.”

“Man cannot be trusted with justice. The truth is, man cannot really be trusted with “punishment.” With it he does not really seek discipline; he wreaks injustice.”

Scientology and Freezone Technology

Now this is a very large and broad topic, actually so large that it was constructed in a Bridge to follow all the steps to freedom and ability.

Here we have Drug Rehab Tech, Study Tech and Training Tech like the course supervision and the check sheets etc.

Then there are the auditing processes designed to handle anything non-optimum in the human condition eg to better communication, your problems, secrets, upsets, stubborness, mental hindrances etc. All designed to handle the mind and the spirit in a sequence to get results.

After this there are the OT levels which are really pre-OT levels designed to again move the person to more ability and freedoms if done right with well qualified  guidance.

Most sessions of auditing use an e-meter to help both the auditor and pc find the energy that is a hindrance and so target it for removal and relief.

Some Scientologists feel that the only way to practice standard tech is outside of the official church and I agree.

And so this is called the independent field or the Freezone.

There is also the Administration Technology of Scientology and the guildance and write-ups from LRH on how to successfully deliver Scientology and how to properly run an Organization.

Today very few Orgs are using LRH Admin and most staff and executives have never studied the OEC Course or the Management Series and so they are doomed.

The Administration of these Policies are based around an Organizing Board that is planned to align the purposes of the individual posts in the Org.

But because this is not applied you will find in the Orgs today disharmony, infighting, no production, no service and so no Scientology.

They rely on donations today to stay afloat and I don’t mean donations for services, I mean they want you to give money and they wish to give you nothing back.

Please expand on this if you have something to add..

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts