Workable Spiritual and Scientific Convergence of Technology

Marc Headley talks about Scientology in Germany.

He discusses topics of Security, Disconnection, Fair Game and his life at the Headquaters of Scientology.

He tells of attempted blackmail and other attempted crimes of the Church.

Also he gives stories of David Miscavaige who is the currrent leader and little tyrant of the RTC.

Watch and let Mark tell you what is..

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

In Scientology we have the basic definition of Clear as ‘a being without his own reactive mind’.

In Spiritologie we have the basic definition of Clear as “A spiritual being without its own subconscious”.

Warning: This blog is written to those specifically with a Scientology training background. I skip many gradients because I assume you have already received some training. Regardless read the book and always study the source materials.

Of course there is a Clear Cog and meter phenomena and supposed abilities attained.

But lets take another view of a 1st Dynamic Goal and that of Spiritologie.

( he is stated to be the LRH of 1965 or one of Rons higher BTs, but I am sure that is another story )

This out of the Spiritologie handbook and I highly recommend it as a book to read. It will save you months of study of Scientology as it covers all of the basics very nicely.

I suggest you read the book fully as the below is just some cut and paste!

——————————-

“A spiritual being without its own subconscious”, is described in Spiritologie as the first big awareness-level to be rehabilitated.”

1. A SB (Spiritual Being) who – knowingly and willingly – is cause over mental space, mental time, energy and matter.

2. A SB which is aware of possessing and steering a physical body; but is also aware of the fact not to be it.

3. A SB without repressions, fears, compulsions or so called psychosomatic illnesses caused by one’s own thinking.

4. A SB with the ability to create, let continue to be or delete every type of subconscious for itself.

5. A SB which released itself from the dedicated (fixed) link to the pictures, masses, energies, pictures, times and spaces of the mind and can think and decide completely independent from it.

6. A SB without undesirable or enforced behaviour patterns – seen from his own viewpoint.

7. A SB whose conclusions, calculations, decisions or thoughts are no longer falsified or distorted by unconscious influences, that previously were the cause for faulty outcomes in his thinking or led to irrational behaviour.

8. A SB who took over the full responsibility for his thinking and acting and no longer attributes this to the past, the subconscious or other sources.

9. An SB without its own subconscious.

“When it is about the self-determination as Impulse 1 all points of this checklist are verified without exception in respect to the person himself!”

“I can assure you that this is an incredibly beautiful and powerful state, but I can also assure you that it only starts to really get moving after this step. Because when this state is reached or rehabilitated with full certainty, one can start to extend this to all eight life-impulses – towards full consciousness as infinity!”

This is a  Spiritologie Checklist to verify there first Level which should in my view summate to a correctly produced Clear.

——————————-

The book which is a massive read and covers all the points and basics of Spiritologie. Could not have been written better by LRH himself. Great small stories to give examples of all the pertinent points and a very simple and entertaining read!

LRH Scientology tech or truths is amongst this data in this book but mentioned in a modern light

eg. Third Party tech.”Is there no saying: ‘If two argue, the third one is happy’?”

Within this story he alludes that we are all ‘PTS to Gods mother in law’ a conclusion formed out of pope speeches. She has her her unwashed fingers in the bowl of mankind

‘Before the beginning was a cause and this cause made the decision to be. Previously, there were neither “being” nor “not-being”, only a potential to be.’

“If you sleep – dreamless sleep – are you then conscious that you exist? Do you have then the idea that you aren’t? No, and there is also no time or the question of “how long was the time before the beginning?” For as long as you sleep dreamlessly there is no “how long”, since time doesn’t exist! Therefore, there is not any idea either like: “How boring to be so long in the original state of non-being.” There simply is nothing at all, do you understand this? Okay, so this cause has by its own decision awakened to being and what did it see? Nothing!”

“Everything – and I actually mean exactly that, namely everything – which you perceive and experience, is exactly that, which you create by yourself through your own causal thinking; in fact exactly now!”

“We ourselves are the Supreme Being and can create divinely, as well as diabolically – but it will always remain our own creation! Happy, conscious work, God!”

“Self-determination is the ability to place matter and energy in space and time, as well as the even higher ability to create the space and the time, in which to place matter and energy.”

“From now on the world will change! And it will change because nobody will wait anymore for a God to free us from war and sorrow, or punishes us for our mistakes, as there is no God besides ourselves who could bring these things about – and did until now! Now, we are many. All with the same infinite, original potential to create – but this time to create consciously.”

——————————-

I am only up to page 128, 1/2 way but it is good and sometimes humorous reading for a past Scientologist’.

You will find the ‘free book download’ in my blog roll to the left of the screen

ps I read on past page 128 and it gets interesting…

Another quote..

“Spiritologie is not Scientology – Spiritologie is free!” – LRH

——————————-

You may wonder why a FSO Class VI C/S would entertain these ideas of new technology from a supposed LRH born in 1966.

Will firstly nothing is impossible but only actually limited by your consideration.

Secondly I consider the value and usefulness of the information as senior.

For example:

If ‘Dad’ came to you and offered in his hand a thousand dollars to help you out.

( But if your relationship with your mother is not one of understanding or giving )

He winks and says, “I am your Mum and we want you to have the money”. Would you then call him a lier and that he is not actually your Mum? Would you then refuse the money because of that?

I look, think then decide. Don’t forget or skimp on the looking ok, it may be fun! Enjoy!

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

For the people protesting Scientology I really hope you begin to lean all about it. What they hear about the Church is its crimes and hostilities and how the Church works to keep these a secret. That’s true. But perhaps a persons mind should not be colored against all possibility that the ‘Auditing Technology’ may actually work or have some value.

Why would so many people put up with so much shit if it did not work to any degree?

When you look at ‘Scientology Technology’ or the ’secret high level processes’, they are just simple sentences; words on a page! No-one could be impressed, not you, not me and so we get chants of ‘down with Scientology and Xemu!’

All of the Scientology Rundowns or processes are simple. They are made up of basic English words that we probably hear, read and see nearly everyday. Some processes that costs the public many thousands of dollars are only a few sentences long. That’s like a couple of thousand dollars per word ???

“Be something your not” is not a process but it shows an un-usualness with words and perhaps how you can mess someone up as be something you’re not is something you cannot do.

These a simple English sentences that are not impressive, magical or powerful.

So whats all the big deal then?

‘The Processes’ are only commands or questions, some may look strange because of grammar changes and noun forming etc But they are mostly simple, but no so simple as to be called stupid. How can these words work together to make powerful Clears or OTs?

These simple sentences work because of the ARC environment that you can create when two people agree to have a session. You both agree that your purpose is to use the techniques that an Auditor knows and to apply them. The result is a great auditing session.

It’s called a technology because it is tricky, requires practice, patients and skill. An ability to use the meter and the different methods of auditor action to make the PC feel safe and listened to. He will then be able to talk and let you know the answers to his problems, valences, to erase past charge on the track etc. The Auditor needs to know the effects that can happen in a pc so to handle it and get the pc through that session so to come out at the end happier.

If you dont understand the auditing environment, if you have not studied the basic books and then not ’spent hours of drilling and practice for months, well then you really cannot know about Scientology and Sessions. Not really..

When at Flag I was asked to take on an unhappy PC or one that wanted to stop sessions or blow from the Org. Sure I would get the charge off but then I would know he was audited beyond his reality. Or the Auditor was shit and the pc knew it.

I would indoctrinate the pc, all that means is ‘checkout what he knows about Scientology basics’ and what he knows about what we are currently doing in session. After an education and agreement we can ‘rock and roll’ and now fast with gains.

So the tech works for some people and many say it works for all people if they want to study it and persist.

The big deal is the Church and how they treat their own staffs and clients.

For sure protest and attack the Church as they are clearly the opponent and the doer of bad deeds. But take a look at the tech, so at least you can know somewhat of your enemy. You don’t have to be a PC but understand that the tech is why the Orgs are there, The Church on the other hand is there only for the money.

The Churches have been around for too long, too much fair game and forced disconnection.

As well now there is other tech in the field and I perceive it to be far more advanced and simple over the RTC Tech.

ANon should know a little bit about the initial Scientology Goals and it would make their protests and interviews so much better. ANon is doing a magic job that I think no-other group could ever of done!

VVWD

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Here is a fantastic idea and website!

It is a service showing all the Freezone Auditors in the World using Google Maps. So you just look at the map and zoom in on your area to locate an Auditor near you.

The Auditor can let you know about his training level, his preferred Bridge and any special actions that he/she can audit.

The best of Auditors and Processors are kicked out of Scientology and the Sea Org including FSO

So the Freezone offers top quality Auditing and C/Sing. Check it out!

If you are looking to go Clear or OT please take a look at http://www.freezoneauditors.org

You can go Clear and OT in the Freezone. For many years alternative sources have been offering their services. It is our intention to connect those seeking further states of awareness to those who can help in that endeavour, whatever the training level of auditor from Dianetics to upper level auditing.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Terril Park is the second interview..

Terril Park is a very active Freezoner and here he gives an interview at an ANon protest against the Church of Scientology. Questions covered are the differences between the’ Freezone LRH Technology’ and the ‘RTC LRH Tech’ and Bridge progress. Also he talks about OTIII, Spiritual Entiities, benifits of Clear and OT, SPs, Meters and the availability of all the Tech outside of the Church.

It is made very clear that anyone looking for LRH Scientology auditing or training is welcome in the Freezone. Well I consider Scientology a ’sinking ship’ due to its management and corruptions so I’m off to learn about the Freezone!

Well done Terril, good interview and I hope there is more to come.

A very interesting briefing about all the Scientology Bridges.

What do I mean about all the Bridges?

Well through time the Bridge has changed a lot and The latest RTC Bridge is very different than all the prior Bridges.

See this video of all the Bridges side by side, get your questions about Clear resolved according to the Bridge.

This also gives great reference to the Scientology Clearing Course and shows how so much case gain has been taken off the current Bridge.

He also gives a LRH definition about Dianetics. “Dianetic Clear – there is such a state but only about 2% can go Clear on Dianetics”

So why are there so many Clear attests from NED? What happened to Power and R6-EW, CC etc

They still need expanded Scietology Grades to go Scientology Clear.

Funny story he mentions, an OT 8 comes to him and says, “I dont feel too OT!”

Rey says, “Well thats becasue you have not done the OT Levels! How are you going to feel OT if you have not done the OT Levels?”

He then explains why, showing how the true OT Levels have been removed off the modern Bridge.

Bridges shown 1970, 75, 78 & 82

Must watch video from Rey Robles.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

This is by Caspar de Rijk, HGA, Class IX

http://www.spiritologie.eu/briefing1_new_tech.htm is the full writeup!

I wrote up a series of evaluations called the Original Bridge Series and decided to play it safe and restored the Old Bridge incl. Grade V, VA (Power) and R6 EW and the Clearing Course as I knew for sure out of my own personal experience that road led to real clears. So we restored Standard Dianetics in the beginning of 2006 and had a ball with it. Also training auditors using Dianetics as the first step just like it was in 1969 was a great success.

LRH Mysteries

In the end of last year an old SO Member told me the story of how a lady of the LRH Household unit had told him in 1968 how LRH had several wardrobes for different body sizes, once I was told she saw LRH in his research room from the back and when she went down to tweendecks a few seconds later she saw LRH giving a lecture.

Well this was certainly an interesting story and would tend to confirm what LRH had already mentioned in the fifties that a thetan could run several bodies at once.

.. he had known in 1964-1966 period three different  L. Ron Hubbards, one was described as a red haired American, then there was a British Hubbard with some missing teeth and yet another one a size bigger with all kind of details like where they were banking and the brands of cigarettes they smoked etc.  He said that the American Hubbard had disappeared on 31 December 1965 never to be seen or heard of. And Filbert said the other two were impostors.

So I called the writer and found out it was this guy himself who was the one claiming to have been LRH. So I decided to find out what kind of a character this ‘joker’ was. This led to records as a movie actor and the lead singer of a heavy metal band named Stimmkraft. In other words unlikely.

However Jolanda and myself went over to Oberhausen, on a weekend to check him out. We met this character, a young person looking like a rocker and sat down to ask him some pertinent questions. Odd thing: he was born in 1966 in other words just after Filbert had asserted the original American Hubbard had disappeared.

We spent a whole evening with him and he did act the part even though this was sort of ‘strange’, less strange it was when he told his story and in particular I got very interested when he went on about his new tech developments.

The most outrageous claim

Here I found this man claiming to have been L.R. Hubbard, asserting in a calm sonore voice that he had as-ised scientology and that it was no longer needed. His (Hubbard’s) case that had been dramatized was now handled, this incl. OT III which had been discharged in 2004 after he fully handled Xenu.

That new tech development was called spiritologie and at first glance already it did make some sense even though it was almost childishly simple – or too simple for words. We had been invited to come by on Sunday again but Jo and me decided to skip it and drove home the next day and we decided to put this whole thing to some rigourous testing.

Download the book HERE

This is by Caspar de Rijk, HGA, Class IX

Potential

The potential of this new tech due to its “power of simplicity” is phenomenal and could easily fulfill the promises once made for something called Super Power; or what about making this tired planet smile.

“I have read about two ‘LRH is back’ websites the first was LRH2 which turned out to be Ralph Hilton playing a joke but still had very nice new tech write ups.

The second is Andreas Buttler out of Germany, also a well writen book once you are past the introduction, so take a read and let me know what you think!”

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Writen here is a great write-up of session style and purpose, showing the effective way of handling Rudiments in a session. You will be supprised at what you dont know about the basics when you read DartSmohen informations.

Visit the ESMB for great tech advices.

Here we go.

In the rote processing procedures of the cult (and possibly in the FZ, but I would imagine it is more relaxed there) the purpose of ruds is to KEY OUT whatever is sitting in the way of the auditor carrying out the procedure determined by the C/S.

This does not handle anything, merely to push it away (until the next time it KEYS IN again).

When I start a session I say START OF SESSION.

Then I ask HAS THE SESSION STARTED FOR YOU ?

Next, I ask WHAT GOALS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SET FOR THIS SESSION ?

Get them noted down.

Next question is WHAT GOALS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SET FOR LIFE ?

Now we are ready to proceed, unless there is an out-rud sitting there. We handle this and then get that question answered.

The handling of the ruds is just like any other processing action; process the person in front of you and handle what comes up.

ARC BREAK

Typically, when a Scn auditor asks “Do you have an ARC Break,” (consulting the meter) if it reads, they say what is it.

Actually, you don’t need a meter. You have the pc in front of you. If his face is up his arse, you know there is something sitting there. Also, I have seen “FN’s” on a pc who is so charged up, they are looking for a sharp object to stab someone. Trust me, your pc is by far the best meter there is.

The pc says I had a fight with my mother (or some such thing).
An experienced auditor might well want more info; When was that, what happened?

Th pc describes what happened.
The auditor then asks “Was that a break in Affinity, A break in reality etc.

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.

The auditor is assessing an incident, NOT the ARC BREAK.

Per the cult definition, an ARC Break is a SUDDEN break in ARC. It does not happen gradually, it is SUDDEN. Something happened to cause the ARC to break.

So, find out more. At what point did the ARC break? It was there, then it wasn’t.

The “upset with my mother” is not the ARC Break. Something happened during that incident (upset). What suddenly happened is the ARC Break.

Usually spotting it results in a realisation. “Oh, it was when I saw her pick up a bowl to throw at me”.

NOW you can ask “At that moment in time, was there a ……”.
You are REPAIRING the break.

By dealing with the charge, force and mass, it erases. Now you can continue, unless, of course an earlier ARC Break comes to the surface. Deal with it the same way. You continue until whatever has been sitting ther has been erased and the pc is now fully in PT and is “in session”.

PRESENT TIME PROBLEM

If you process a person over the top of a present time problem you will not make progress. Why? Because the guy is not in session. His attention is fixated elsewhere.

What does “in session” mean? It means being there willingly and has attention on their case.

So, what is a problem? According to Hubbard it is a force-counterforce etc.
It floats there in PT.

So how does a problem come into being.?

Well, you have to consider there is a problem in order for it to exist.

If you don’t consider an opposing effort, force or intention to be a problem then is simply isn’t.

What happens is that at one moment you were certain, now you are uncertain. You have become confused about it.

That is why behind every PTP there is a prior confusion.

So, how did the guy get confused? In order to do so, they have shifted from cause to effect.

What caused them to switch? They became the effect of someone. As a result they became confused.

So, find out who that person was, the one who got them to become confused and thereby set up the PTP.

Now, WHY did they become the effect of that person?

Probably they had DONE or SAID something against them. Find out what it was, find out what problem they were trying to solve by doing it.

You will find that it all starts to fall away.

Again, this may well allow an earlier PTP to come to the surface.

What you are doing is handling charge, force & mass.

MISSED WITHOLDS

First of all, there is nothing wrong with a withold. You can have laudable ones; a partner’s present. organising a surprise party etc.

The problem comes when someone ELSE does or says something that makes YOU think they might know.

The effect is to cause you to separate away from that person. You might find you become critical of them, natter about them and try and avoid being in the same space.

What has happened is that charge has been triggered by what you perceive to be a “nearly finding out”.

The way to handle this is to determine what it was that you were witholding (this is not the charged aspect) and then find out whqt that other person did or said that made you think they knew.

Get exact place, time, allo details about that moment in time. This is confronting the charge and it will erase.

Again, it may allow an earlier MWH to surface. Repeat the same steps until the whole thing is handled.

As in all processing actions, HANDLED is the key word. It means “terminatedly taken care of, dealt with fully” It does not meqn KEY it out.

In order to end a session after completing the processing, or taking the client to such a huge win, they are totally blown out, you ask

How have you progressed towards your goals in life?

Have you acheived your goal fore the session?

If anything comes up, deal with it.

Is it ok if we end session?

If yes, then say END OF SESSION

Lastly you say TELL ME I AM NO LONGER PROCESSING YOU.

I trust this gives the answers you were seeking.

DS

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Scientology Technology can be briefly covered in three areas.

Ethics, Tech and Policy.

Currently Scientology has abandoned these three and just focused on PR and propaganda for money.

Ethics tech is the technology of survival it is the prerequisite for the Scientology Processes to work. If you are feeling guilty for your transgressions and actively causing harm in your life, well then it is very hard to be interested in your own case and willing to talk to the Auditor.

Ethics tech in itself is very valuable and also very dangerous when misused on others.

PTS tech, The Conditions, 3rd Party Law are all very valid and when working you will not only survive well but you will also feel great!

All the Church applies today is Disconnection and is quite type three and thinks enemies are everywhere. Funny enough this is starting to become true as they “make” more enemies each day.

LRH quotes:

“No matter how criminal an individual is, he will be trying, one way or another, to put ethics in on himself.”

“Ethics is so native to the individual that when it goes off the rails he will always seek to overcome his own lack of ethics.”

“Man cannot be trusted with justice. The truth is, man cannot really be trusted with “punishment.” With it he does not really seek discipline; he wreaks injustice.”

Scientology and Freezone Technology

Now this is a very large and broad topic, actually so large that it was constructed in a Bridge to follow all the steps to freedom and ability.

Here we have Drug Rehab Tech, Study Tech and Training Tech like the course supervision and the check sheets etc.

Then there are the auditing processes designed to handle anything non-optimum in the human condition eg to better communication, your problems, secrets, upsets, stubborness, mental hindrances etc. All designed to handle the mind and the spirit in a sequence to get results.

After this there are the OT levels which are really pre-OT levels designed to again move the person to more ability and freedoms if done right with well qualified  guidance.

Most sessions of auditing use an e-meter to help both the auditor and pc find the energy that is a hindrance and so target it for removal and relief.

Some Scientologists feel that the only way to practice standard tech is outside of the official church and I agree.

And so this is called the independent field or the Freezone.

There is also the Administration Technology of Scientology and the guildance and write-ups from LRH on how to successfully deliver Scientology and how to properly run an Organization.

Today very few Orgs are using LRH Admin and most staff and executives have never studied the OEC Course or the Management Series and so they are doomed.

The Administration of these Policies are based around an Organizing Board that is planned to align the purposes of the individual posts in the Org.

But because this is not applied you will find in the Orgs today disharmony, infighting, no production, no service and so no Scientology.

They rely on donations today to stay afloat and I don’t mean donations for services, I mean they want you to give money and they wish to give you nothing back.

Please expand on this if you have something to add..

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

My personal opinion is that because of the Suppression and undue pressure placed on staff and public it is impossible to have an on source session today in Scientology.

Everyone is to a degree PTS from the fear of an Ethics cycle and all are aware of injustices done by the Church but don’t speak out due to this suppression.

This may not be true of some missions or field auditors who can do their own thing and are not regulated by threats. Well I hope that is the case and some small groups are doing ok.

Because the Church is not ‘delivering what was promised’ this is out KSW and therefore not Scientology. They are practicing something else and it comes from an evil place..

The amount of re-do on all the courses and the amount of modern revision to books and lectures prevents us from saying we have source materials any longer. Lucky many Freezoners have this material archived and put them to use everyday.

Take a look at this guys LRH collection. He is amassing all the tech he can get for future preservation. Click the picture for more information.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts